🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam decision, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to use a newly configured congressional district plan that is projected to include as many as five new Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 decision, handed down on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to lift a federal judge's injunction that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating much confusion and disrupting the sensitive federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its decision.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably classified voters based on their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the new maps. It had ordered the state to revert to the maps created after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Strong Opposition

Through a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's ruling. She contended that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was written by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a breach of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Struggle

This decision comes amid a nationwide contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Usually, map-drawing takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several additional GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas AG hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

Conversely, opposition party representatives criticized the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

A top Democratic leader said the court had once again eroded its credibility by rubber-stamping a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.